FIFA Evaluates Future of Hydration Breaks Post-world Cup Feedback
WHO:
Al Jazeera - Arsene Wenger, FIFA’s chief of football development
Reuters - Arsene Wenger, FIFA’s chief of football development
WHAT:
Al Jazeera - Wenger stated, “No,” when asked if the hydration breaks improved players’ abilities and the flow of the game.
Reuters - Wenger mentioned that hydration breaks did not impact the flow of play and had no effect on match results.
Reuters - Spain coach Luis de la Fuente and Netherlands captain Virgil van Dijk supported the intent behind hydration breaks in extreme heat but questioned their necessity in cooler conditions.
Reuters - England coach Thomas Tuchel noted that hydration breaks had a bigger impact than initially anticipated, breaking the momentum of matches.
Reuters - Uruguay coach Marcelo Bielsa criticized the breaks, stating they added nothing to football and destroyed the sport’s cultural essence.
Al Jazeera - FIFA will analyze the impact of hydration breaks after the World Cup.
Al Jazeera - Wenger stated that some fans are unhappy with the hydration break introduced at the World Cup.
Al Jazeera - The hydration break is a three-minute mandatory interval midway through each half.
Al Jazeera - FIFA reported a decrease in medical interventions from 2.3 times per match in 2022 to 1.6 in the current tournament.
Al Jazeera - Fans complained about the mid-half interval and speculated it was implemented for commercial reasons.
WHERE:
Al Jazeera - The final match is hosted at the New York New Jersey Stadium.
Al Jazeera - The Egypt-Iran match took place in Seattle.
WHEN:
Al Jazeera - The final match is scheduled for Sunday.
WHY:
Reuters - Wenger explained that the decision to implement hydration breaks for every match was made to avoid differences between games, despite varying playing conditions.
Al Jazeera - The official justification for the hydration break is to protect players from the heat.
Al Jazeera - Wenger noted that the hydration break was needed in many games for medical reasons.
HOW:
Al Jazeera - Before the World Cup, referees could order hydration breaks based on their discretion, lasting about 90 seconds, compared to the current three minutes.
(UPDATED July 19, 2026 13:19 UTC)
In a recent discussion about hydration breaks in football, Wenger firmly stated that these breaks do not enhance players' abilities or the flow of the game and have no impact on match results. While Spain's coach Luis de la Fuente and Netherlands captain Virgil van Dijk acknowledged the intent behind these breaks during extreme heat, they raised concerns about their necessity in cooler conditions. England's coach Thomas Tuchel observed that hydration breaks have a more significant effect than expected, disrupting the momentum of matches, while Uruguay's Marcelo Bielsa criticized them for detracting from the cultural essence of the sport.
--
(UPDATED July 19, 2026 12:10 UTC)
FIFA is set to analyze the impact of hydration breaks after the World Cup, as Arsene Wenger, FIFA’s chief of football development, acknowledged that some fans are unhappy with the three-minute mandatory interval introduced midway through each half. While the official reason for these breaks is to protect players from the heat, FIFA has reported a decrease in medical interventions during matches, dropping from 2.3 times per game in 2022 to 1.6 in the current tournament. The final match is scheduled for Sunday at the New York New Jersey Stadium, where the hydration break's effectiveness will be closely examined.