Supreme Court Lets Border Wall Work Resume in Texas’s Big Bend
WHO:
CNN - The Supreme Court issued an unsigned opinion; Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the only noted dissenter and did not explain her reasoning.
CBS News - Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said she would have denied the Justice Department’s request for emergency relief.
NBC News - The case was challenged by the Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Ruidosa Church, and Danny Miller, a river guide who owns property in the area.
CBS News - The plaintiffs included an environmental nonprofit, a professional riverboat guide, and a religious organization.
CBS News - U.S. District Judge Kathleen Cardone issued the injunction; Solicitor General D. John Sauer warned of consequences from stopping construction.
CBS News - Homeland Security secretaries Kristi Noem and Markwayne Mullin issued three project waivers.
WHAT:
ABC News - The Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that the government “is exceedingly likely to prevail” on its argument that the district court lacked jurisdiction to pause construction.
ABC News - The Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that the government “is exceedingly likely to prevail” on its argument that the district court lacked jurisdiction to pause construction.
ABC News - Construction is to include physical walls, access roads, and vehicle barriers.
ABC News US - The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to resume border-wall construction in Texas’s Big Bend region.
CNN - The Court paused a lower-court ruling blocking construction while the administration’s authority to bypass environmental requirements is considered.
CBS News - The Court lifted a district-court injunction against construction of a wall and related infrastructure.
NBC News - In a five-page unsigned decision, the Court said the federal judge lacked authority to issue the ruling; Jackson was the only dissenter.
CNN - The administration is seeking to construct “300-plus” miles of border barrier and roads; NBC News reported the government’s plan involves 341 miles.
CBS News - The government said more than 89,000 people attempting illegal entry were apprehended in the area between 2021 and 2025. Plaintiffs said annual apprehensions there represented 0.3% to 2.2% of border-wide totals, despite the sector covering more than 25% of the U.S.-Mexico border.
CBS News - A proposed 30-foot wall, more than 200 miles of patrol roads, and roughly 17 miles of vehicle barriers were described; CBP said the wall would not cut through Big Bend National Park, but other infrastructure would.
CBS News - A 47-mile wall section in Hudspeth County had begun construction. Cardone’s injunction had barred barriers, related infrastructure, and “any construction or ground disturbing activities.”
WHERE:
CNN - The project is in the Big Bend region of Texas, including Big Bend National Park.
CBS News - The Big Bend sector covers more than 500 miles of the southern border and includes Big Bend National Park.
CBS News - Plaintiffs cited Big Bend Ranch State Park and nearly 200 miles of the Rio Grande Wild and Scenic River corridor.
WHY:
CBS News - Plaintiffs’ lawyers argued that once habitat, vegetation, historic resources, livelihoods, private property, and wilderness landscapes are damaged or fragmented, “no final judgment can restore the status quo.”
NBC News - The administration’s broader plan, backed by funding from the Republican-controlled Congress, calls for completing a 2,000-mile border installation with steel panels, vehicle barriers, and new surveillance technology.
CNN - The administration invoked a law allowing the government to “waive all legal requirements” for expeditious construction in areas of “high illegal entry.”
CBS News - The Supreme Court said the injunction delayed construction and “impedes the Government from advancing its ‘compelling interests’ in border security and integrity.”
NBC News - The administration argued that an open Big Bend area could be exploited by people seeking illegal entry; challengers argued construction would permanently alter an “irreplaceable landscape” and threaten historic and cultural resources.
HOW:
NBC News - The Supreme Court’s unsigned decision was five pages long.
CNN - The Department of Homeland Security bypassed laws concerning historic preservation, the environment, and Native American artifacts.
NBC News - Waivers were issued by Noem in February and Mullin in May and July, invoking federal authority under a 1996 immigration law.
(UPDATED November 9, 2026 22:59 UTC)
The Supreme Court cleared the Trump administration to resume border-wall construction in Texas’s Big Bend region. The unsigned ruling was eight to one, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting. The court said the lower judge lacked authority to halt construction, despite environmental and cultural concerns.
--
(UPDATED November 9, 2026 22:03 UTC)
The Supreme Court cleared the Trump administration to resume border-wall construction in Texas’s Big Bend region. The unsigned ruling said the lower-court judge likely lacked authority to halt construction. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented as challengers warned the project threatens the landscape.
--
(UPDATED November 9, 2026 21:07 UTC)
The Supreme Court cleared the Trump administration to resume border-wall construction in Texas’s Big Bend region. The unsigned ruling lifted an injunction, citing border security and the judge’s lack of authority. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented; challengers warn construction threatens sensitive landscapes.